The Lived Experiences of SEAMEO INNOTECH GURO21 Graduates

Jojie Rupinta Honculada, Genesis B. Naparan

Abstract


This study examines the experiences of eight teachers who have graduated from an online course. The SEAMEO INNOTECH GURO21. The primary data collection method made use of one on one interviews.  The results of the study informed that in understanding the lived experiences of those who graduated from the first course of SEAMEO INNOTECH GURO21 can be categorized into two themes: (a) equipping teachers with the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values of the 21st century; and (2) facilitating 21st century learning. This research revealed that as teachers, one must be knowledgeable enough to carefully choose strategies and techniques tailored-fit for the kind and level of the learners. The acquisition of the 21st century skills has become an essential part of the generation. Thus, teachers must undergo seminars and workshops and even enroll in online courses to be upgraded with the latest trends of this generation. The participants, from their responses, revealed the change within themselves in line with their profession and in the development of their personality. The course had made them shift from being a traditional teacher to a techno-savvy one. This means using techniques and strategies the old way and how they smoothly transformed into technology-based teaching. Recommendations are offered for school heads, and for further research. This is to further enhance this study and to compare other findings in line with teacher development programs through online courses.

Keywords


SEAMEO Innotech; Lived Experiences; Equipping teachers for the 21st century; Facilitating 21st Century Learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action A Social Cognitive Theory Prentrice-Hall Englewood Cliffs NJ.

Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126.

Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International encyclopedia of education, 7(2), 548-556.

Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport, education and society, 22(2), 288-304.

Conceicᾶo, S.C (2006). Faculty lived experiences in the online Environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57 (1), 26-45.

Cresswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2011.

Crosslin, M. (2016). From instructivism to connectivism: theoretical underpinnings of MOOCs. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3(1), 6.

Cutcher, A. & Cook, P. (2016) One must also be an Artist: Online delivery of teacher education. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 17 (13).

David Harris (2016) Rhizomatic education and Deleuzian theory, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31:3, 219-232, DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2016.1205973

Forbes, D., & Gedera, D. (2019). From confounded to common ground: Misunderstandings between tertiary teachers and students in online discussions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age?. Medical teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069.

Jung, I. (2019). Connectivism and Networked Learning. In Open and Distance Education Theory Revisited (pp. 47-55). Springer, Singapore.

Kratochwil, F. (2017). Constructivism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

Lapan, S., Quartaroli, M. & Riemer, F. (2012). Qualitative Research: An Introduction to methods and designs. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

Leslie, H. J. (2019). Trifecta of Student Engagement: A framework for an online teaching professional development course for faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.

Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity--A Framework for the Design/Problem Solving Discourse in Technology Education. Journal of technology education, 17(1), 35-52.

Lewis, T. (2009). Creativity in technology education: Providing children with glimpses of their inventive potential. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 255-268.

Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. U. (2018) engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22 (1) 205-222.

Michael, K. Y. (2001). The Effect of a Computer Simulation Activity versus a Hands-on Activity on Product Creativity in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 13(1), 31-43.

Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating Novice and Experienced EFL Teachers’ Perceived TPACK for their Professional Development. Cogent Education, 1632010.

Peterson, R. E. (2001). Establishing the creative environment in technology education: Creativity doesn't just happen by chance; the prepared environment nourished it. The Technology Teacher, 61(4), 7-11.

Philipsen, B. Tondeur, J., Pynoo, B. Vanslambrouck, S. & Zhu C. (2019) Examining lived experiences in a professional development program for online teaching: a hermeneutic phenomenological Approach. Australian Journal of Educational Technology.

Sezer, B., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Learning management system acceptance scale (LMSAS): A validity and reliability study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3).

Snow, K. Wardly, L., Carter, L. & Maher, P. (2019). Lived Experiences of Online and Experiential Learning in Four Undergraduate Programs. Collected Essay on Learning and Teaching, 12. 79-93.

Sonmez, E.E & Mustafa, K.O. C. (2018) Preservice Teacher’s Live Experiences with Taking Courses through Leaning Management Systems: A Qualitative Study. Turkish Online Journal Distance Education, 19 (2), 101-116.

Thorsteinsson, G., & Page, T. (2007). Creativity in Technology Education Facilitated through Virtual Reality Learning Environments: A Case Study. Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 74-87.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v2i2.238

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 33 times
PDF : 16 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jojie Rupinta Honculada, Genesis B. Naparan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PUBLISHED BY:

RESEARCH SYNERGY FOUNDATION & FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA INDONESIA

International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education (IJTAESE). 

Mailing Address: 
Research Synergy Foundation
Jalan Nyaman no 31 
Komplek Sinergi Antapani 
Bandung 40291 - Indonesia. 

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Universitas Terbuka Indonesia 
Jl. Pd. Cabe Raya, Pd. Cabe Udik, 
Kec. Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, 
Banten 15418. 
Phone: (021) 7490941. 

Email:ijtaese@journals.rsfpress.com

 

The International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education (IJTAESE) is indexed by:
 
   
 
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.